Stuff for Dads
Sweeney Todd (DVD)
Starring: Johnny Depp, Helena Bonham-Carter, Alan Rickman, Timothy Spall and Sacha Baron Cohen.
Rated: 18.
Story: An eighteenth century barber has his wife and child stolen by a wicked judge who gets him transported to a penal colony. Years later, the barber returns, seeking revenge. When his plans don't go well, he takes out his frustration by giving a whole load of customers
very close shaves and forming a lucrative business partnership with the lady who owns the pie shop downstairs.
Mmmmm... Gravy...
Comments: Thanks to a mechanised display at the Museum of Childhood, even my four-year-old knows the basic gist of
Sweeney Todd - people go into the top floor wanting a shave and come out the bottom floor in parcels of pastry. There's not much more to it than that. The film expands on this with a subplot about Todd's lost daughter and adds some love interest with the pie lady but it's all rather predictable and hinges on huge coincidences. As with most musicals, the plot is merely an excuse for some singing. The songs in
Sweeney Todd are nowhere near good enough to hold things together, however. None are particularly memorable and some are actually grating.
The visuals of the movie are more of a draw than the music. The sets, make-up and costumes are designed to give an impression of black and white which means the thick, red blood stands out strikingly. Unfortunately, combined with the liberal spurting effects, this makes the gorier scenes reminiscent of low budget zombie films rather than anything more artistic. As a bonus, though, since
everyone looks as pale as if they've lived in a cave for a decade, Bonham-Carter appears healthier than normal.
The best bits of the film are the scenes with Sacha Baron Cohen. The rest of the cast do fine but it's ultimately a waste of everyone's talents. I prefer my daughter's version:
Everybody, everybody, everybody, everybody, everybody likes being a person.Nobody, nobody, nobody, nobody, nobody likes being a pie!
Conclusion: People go in, pies come out. Now with added singing.
Explosions: None.
Cockroaches: Plenty.
Low point: The duet between Rickman and Depp. (
Ooh, my ears!)
Blood: Gloopy and pink.
Cornish pasty, anyone?: Maybe I'll pass just now, thanks...
Rating: 2/5.

Labels: film review, horror, musical
Agree? Disagree? Got a question?
Add your comment here.
Resident Evil - Degeneration (DVD)
Starring: Some voice actors who no doubt wish to remain nameless... and an umbrella.
Rated: 15.
Story: Terrorists have released the T-virus in an airport and there's a danger the G-virus may be let loose as well. Leon S Kennedy and Claire Redfield must renew their Raccoon City partnership, shoot some zombies in the head and then have a never-ending boss battle with a mutated monster that just won't die.
So, yeah, imagine a new
Resident Evil game with no actual game, only the cutscenes.
Scary, eh?
(And not in a good way...)
Comments: Capcom have milked the
Resident Evil franchise hard since the release of the first game in 1996. After almost twenty different games, three live-action films and a stack of merchandising, here's a computer-animated movie picking up the plot a while after
Resident Evil 4. That's the game, not the film, by the way, since the storylines in the two media have diverged. But, then again, if you didn't know that already you should probably move along now because
Degeneration is hard enough to follow even with a hazy memory of having played half a dozen of the games.
In particular, if
Resident Evil 2 passed you by, you're not going to get much out of this.
Sadly, however, knowing your Umbrella from your T-virus still doesn't make
Degeneration much fun. The first twenty minutes show some promise: decent visuals, a vaguely intriguing setup, familiar characters and zombies. There's a possibility it might all rumble along nicely. Then Leon turns up and everything goes pear shaped. Nothing makes sense, the middle section is dull and the final third is an excess of daft mayhem allowed to run wild without the budget restraints of live-action.
Some of the dialogue is so bad it's almost good but most of it is just plain bad. The voice acting is frequently wooden and occasionally the pauses between lines are too long, as if the recordings haven't been edited together properly. It speaks volumes about the quality of the script that Leon has to spend a couple of minutes at the end of the film explaining what was going on and the motivations of the other characters.
We've grown used to this level of ineptness in games because the cutscenes are dictated by the confines of the unlikely gameplay (which in
Resident Evil consists of searching spooky mansions for weird keys while shooting zombies and solving obscure logic puzzles). As long as the games are fun to play, it doesn't matter if the story is ropey - the clunky dialogue adds to the B-movie atmosphere. Take out the game, however, and all that's left is a B-movie.
Conclusion: Plan Zombie from Outer Space.
Explosions: Plenty.
Brooding loners, cute little girls who need rescued, dodgy senators, unstoppable monsters, underground facilities and scientists who talk too slowly: One of each.
Ridiculous feats of acrobatics: Several.
Impressive CGI: Lots.
Good writing: None.
Rating: 2/5 if you've enjoyed the games, else 1/5.
Labels: action (vol.4), film review (vol.6), horror, sci-fi
Agree? Disagree? Got a question?
Add your comment here.
Alien vs Predator 2 - Requiem (DVD)
Starring: A Predator, a whole stack of Aliens and various beautiful people waiting around to be lunch.
Rated: 15.
Story: A Predator spaceship crashes on Earth and some Alien specimens escape near a small American town. Another Predator arrives to clean up the mess and keep it all secret. Lots of people get minced.
Comments: Aliens and Predators fighting each other should be the best thing ever.
It's not. It's mainly dark and confusing and not very involving.
The antics of the humans trying to get out the way are more interesting but are relatively indistinguishable from the antics of the humans trying to get out of the way of vampires, zombies and giant lizards in a score of other films... apart from the bit in the maternity ward - that's probably worth skipping if you've got a new arrival due any time soon...
Conclusion: A film you've seen a dozen times before but with the addition of everyone's two favourite psychotic extra-terrestrial species. Could be worse. (Have you seen
Alien Resurrection, for instance?)
Explosions: Lots.
Pregnant women: Several.
Housedads: One.
Scenes in which the housedad doesn't get eaten: Two.
Life lesson: If you're going to stand next to a window and say to a child, "Look! See! No monsters," remember to at least glance out the window first.
Rating: 3/5.
Labels: action (vol.4), film review (vol.5), horror, quick, sci-fi
Agree? Disagree? Got a question?
Add your comment here.
Black Sheep (DVD)
Starring: A load of psycho sheep.
Rated: 15.
Story: A genetic experiment goes wrong and the flocks of a remote New Zealand farm turn nasty.
Comments: This really shouldn't work. It should be one joke stretched to breaking point.
Killer sheep! Ho, ho! ... Bored now... Happily, the script keeps up a decent stream of gags and doesn't plump for the standard slasher scenario of a large group of idiots getting picked off one by one.
There are some unnecessarily gory scenes near the end that are maybe meant as parody but come across as gross. They'd be more worthwhile if the film was in the least bit scary. Bear in mind that I found
I am Legend scary. This just isn't.
Then again, I'm glad I'm not going on a camping trip in Wales any time soon.
Conclusion: It's hard to imagine a movie about killer sheep that's better than this. (You know what I'm saying...)
Explosions: One large one (full of sheep).
Fields: Lots (also full of sheep).
Deep, dark pits: One (full of bits of sheep).
Haggis: One (probably full of bits of sheep, but it's kind of hard to tell.)
Unconvincing monsters: Hundreds. (They look a bit like sheep but are really full of stuffing and cheap animatronics).
Rating: 3/5.
Labels: comedy, film review (vol.5), horror, quick
Agree? Disagree? Got a question?
Add your comment here.
The Invasion (DVD)
Starring: Nicole Kidman (& Daniel Craig but, you know, who cares? It's got Nicole Kidman in it and it's not
Practical Magic. Hurrah!)
Rated: 15.
Story: A mysterious alien virus starts turning the whole world into Stepford. A psychologist (Kidman) uncovers the sinister goings on and must escape assimilation, protect her son and save the day while wearing tight sweaters. (Her doctor friend (Craig) helps but, again, who cares?)
Yep,
Invasion of the Body Snatchers rides again.
Comments: This is really a zombie flick, except, rather than rip faces off, the zombies spit in everyone else's coffee. They look human, they're emotionless and they're usually placid. It's
Attack of the Prozac People.
Although never very scary, this is more nail-biting than it sounds. Fortunately, the film doesn't fall into the trap of a lengthy build up. Everything moves pleasingly quickly from 'Hey? Have you noticed anything odd recently?' to 'Let's drive really fast and squish some zombies'.
Certain of the situations are a little silly but the basic idea is quite thought provoking. In passing, the film questions what it means to be human and asks what price we're willing to pay for free will. It'll have added resonance if you've ever been on anti-depressants. Yeah, they make the world a 'better' place but it's at a cost.
Conclusion:
28 Weeks Later is more tense and
The Faculty is more fun but this is a fast-paced effort which contains something to think about and Nicole Kidman.
Explosions: A few.
Unlikely escapes: Several.
Nicole: Lots.
Zombies: Cuddly... until they're sick in your coffee.
Drink?: Er, not right now thanks...
Practical Magic?: A film so bad that even the presence of Kidman
and Sandra Bullock couldn't save it. That's pretty bad.
Rating: 4/5.
Labels: film review (vol.4), horror, quick, sci-fi (vol.1), thriller
Agree? Disagree? Got a question?
Add your comment here.
Sunshine (DVD)
Starring: Rose Byrne, Cillian Murphy, The Human Torch and an assortment of other faces you'll struggle to place.
Rated: 15
Story: The sun is dying. A group of astronauts are sent to drop a special bomb into it to give it a jumpstart. They bicker, they chat, they do astronaut kind of things and then they stumble across the remains of the first ship sent to do the job. Rather than getting on with the task in hand, they decide to investigate.
Take a wild guess as to how well that goes...
Comments: A few years ago, a couple of films about astronauts traveling to Mars came out at about the same. I think they were called
Red Planet and
Mission to Mars but I'm not entirely sure and they were so forgettable that I can't even be bothered to check. They've pretty much blended together in my head. Looks like I'm not the only one that's happened to, though, because mix those two movies with a touch of
The Core and a dash of
2001, and you'd have the first half of
Sunshine. Throw in a little
Sphere and a portion of generic slasher movie and you'd have the second half.
Yep, it starts off familiar and almost interesting and ends up familiar and rather silly.
What with the journey taking months and all the talk of heat-shields and such, the set up is obviously supposed to be more NASA than
Star Trek. I somewhat suspect, however, that if NASA had a computer which controlled everything on one of their ships, they wouldn't stop it overheating by sticking it in an OPEN pool of liquid coolant. I hope that someone would think, "Hang on a minute... What happens if the artificial gravity stops working, or there's a depressurisation in the computer room? Maybe we need to look at this again. And while we're at it, let's send enough oxygen with the ship to last for the entire journey rather than faffing with putting a garden in there. Sure, the oxygen will be heavy but, since the bomb is THE SIZE OF MANHATTAN, who's going to notice a few extra gas tanks? And maybe we should teach all the crew members how to set off the bomb. You know, in case something happens to that physicist guy. We could even make it so there's a handy control panel or something rather than requiring a selection of bits and bobs connected together with crocodile clips. And..." The list goes on. (And that's not even examining the plausibility of the central plot device).
Apparently, scientists were brought in to consult on the movie but, as with
Deja Vu, they were asked the wrong questions. The details of the bomb are of no interest whatsoever - all the audience needs to know is that it's a bomb that has to go into the sun. That way, it's essentially magic, and we can get on with watching Rose Byrne and some explosions. It's the details of everything else that should have been checked out.
I have to imagine that the primary audience of
Sunshine is people with a scientific background. Even the kind of teenage boy who's going to watch this movie is liable to have some clue about space travel. Thus, having a spaceship full of ludicrous design choices is something of an oversight. It's what everyone's going to talk about; it's what will put them off buying the DVD. (Well, actually, the rubbish plot that relies on people identifying danger but failing to call for back up before going to investigate might do that, too, but that's beside the point). It's these 'little things' that should have been run past some science graduates. I don't care how the faster-than-light travel happens in
Star Wars or how the Death Star works - I'm happy to accept it. It's the use of 'parsec' as a measure of time rather than distance that grates every time.
Thinking about it, though,
Sunshine has to be applauded for at least trying. There are hardly any recent science fiction movies set close to the present day and involving relatively realistic space travel. There's those two Mars films and another couple of movies separated at birth -
Armageddon and
Deep Impact. Unfortunately, despite the lack of competition,
Sunshine still manages to come across as derivative.
I wonder if we'll ever get a space-based film set in the near future that doesn't involve aliens, a rescue mission or the end of the world.
Conclusion: You'd be better spending your money on some energy-saving daylight bulbs - they're great.
Sunshine isn't.
Explosions: One or two.
Scientists involved: Not enough.
Similarities to other movies: Quite a few.
Number of crew members whose names you'll remember before they die: Not so many.
Rating: 2/5.
Labels: film review (vol.3), horror, sci-fi (vol.1)
Agree? Disagree? Got a question?
Add your comment here.
28 Weeks Later (DVD)
Starring: Robert Carlyle, Rose Byrne, a couple of kids, a bigger budget and a horde of rabid zombies.
Rated: 18
Story: Mainland Britain is under quarantine thanks to the Rage virus. Once infected, victims go crazy within thirty seconds and start attacking anyone they can lay their teeth on. Thankfully (kind of), the virus has wiped itself out by killing pretty much the entire population. Rebuilding has begun, the American military has taken over, everything's going to be fine...
Comments:
28 Days Later was a slightly unusual zombie film. The apocalypse had pretty much been and gone before the story started, leaving deserted streets and the occasional fast, vicious zombie running about to leap out unexpectedly. There were no crowds of shuffling undead in sight. This made the film more haunting and scarier than certain other zombie films. It probably also made it a great deal cheaper.
The sequel has obviously had much more money thrown at it. This adds atmosphere on occasion, with characters wandering through vast empty stretches of London. Sometimes, though, it just means visual spectacle replaces inventiveness.
28 Weeks Later resembles
Resident Evil - big explosions, hordes of zombies, a touch of moral dilemma and a nemesis that just will not go away. After the first few minutes, you pretty much know where it's going.
The first film unexpectedly changed tack about halfway through for some musings on human nature. Who's really evil? Scary, face-chewing zombies or scary, gun-wielding nutters who'd do anything to survive? The sequel poses the odd ethical question about the greater good but is really more interested in whether you've got enough popcorn.
Ach, it's predictable and a little silly but I liked it. Maybe that's just because it's set in Britain and so all the zombie mayhem feels closer to home. The strength of the first film was in making the viewer identify with ordinary people caught up in madness. It still pops into my head every so often, making me wonder what I would do if the whole world went down the tubes and friends could turn to monsters in a matter of seconds. Where would I go? How would I feel?
28 Weeks Later manages to retain something of that while adding more action. It's just not as original or memorable.
Conclusion: More entertaining to watch than the first one but with less to say.
Explosions: Like zombies. None for ages and then a whole load come along at once.
Gore: Some but I'm not sure how much - I was hiding behind my beer.
Tension: Lots.
Actual scares: Few.
Most important question to ask your double-glazing salesman: Is it zombie-proof?
Rating: 3/5.
Labels: action (vol.2), film review (vol.3), horror
Agree? Disagree? Got a question?
Add your comment here.
Severance (DVD)
Starring: Danny Dyer (who looks kind of familiar), Laura Harris (the new girl from
The Faculty) and Tim
McInnerny (the thick one from
Blackadder).
Rated: 15
Story: A psycho gatecrashes a team-building weekend. Hilarity almost ensues.
Comments: This had potential but, as comedy slasher films go, it's neither that funny nor that scary. The characters are office comedy stereotypes - spineless manager, arrogant git, joking waster, unattainable female, frumpy female, officious sycophant and decent bloke - so it's difficult to take their peril seriously. Then again, having them squabble a lot and then die horribly isn't that funny.
Feels like some students' final year project.
Conclusion: A good idea that's spread too thin. Could do better.
Explosions: A couple.
Laughs: Occasional.
Scares: Few.
Stereotypes: Everyone.
Entertaining moments which aren't in the trailer: None.
Rating: 2/5.
Labels: comedy, film review (vol.3), horror, quick
Agree? Disagree? Got a question?
Add your comment here.